Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet (3rd Gen) review: Working with style

A 2-in-1 that I don’t want to stop using.

Lenovo’s final piece of the ThinkPad X1 lineup is the Tablet, now in its third generation and looking just as svelte as its companions, the X1 Carbon and X1 Yoga. It now looks more than ever like the Surface Pro — no more detachable modules that snap onto the keyboard dock with an adapter, no more reverse kickstand — and it has more recent 8th Gen Intel hardware.

So how well does it perform on an everyday basis? I used the X1 Tablet for about a week and came away impressed. I thought the second-gen version was more suited to those who need a ThinkPad, but this refreshed model can no doubt fit into the hands of just about anyone. Let’s find out why.

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wmexperts/~3/wlSzhixlgyQ/lenovo-thinkpad-x1-tablet-3rd-gen-review

Why open sourcing Windows 10 Mobile won't change anything #AskDanWindows 49

This week’s episode of #AskDanWindows I field questions from users about why open-sourcing Windows 10 Mobile won’t work (and why it’s a bad idea), how does Microsoft Office run on Windows 10 on ARM, should Microsoft released a tethered HoloLens and more!

Audience questions Episode 49

Should Microsoft open-source the Windows 10 Mile platform? – ASM Khen
Is it possible for Microsoft to release a tethered AR headset, i.e. HoloLens but wired, so that it can be set at a lower price point for consumers? – Maxwell F
You intrigued me with the HP Envy x2 review. What about Microsoft Office for Windows on ARM? Is it there? How’s the performance? – @atlan1504
How is the recent refocus on Cortana any different from Windows Mobile? – constantreader16
Thanks to everyone for the questions!

Email me!

Don’t use Twitter? After much feedback, we are happy to announce you can forward your questions to AskDan@WindowsCentral.com to submit your requests!

AskDan forums!

Hate using email? Join me on our #AskDan Forums at Windows Central! I’ll occasionally jump in there to try and answer questions or take ideas for new episodes of our web series.

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wmexperts/~3/68R8zdC1-mg/askdanwindows-49

Halo Infinite targeting 4K resolution on Xbox One X

There’s a new Halo game coming to Xbox One.

A week ago, Microsoft opened its E3 2018 briefing with a teaser for Halo Infinite which is powered by the new Slipspace Engine. According to Xbox’s Phil Spencer, the game is Master Chief’s greatest story yet. 343 Industries added that the engine allows opportunities for emergent experiences for gamers of today and tomorrow. The official website states that Halo Infinite is targeting Xbox One and PC, and should run at “4K Ultra HD” and “HDR” on Xbox One X.

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wmexperts/~3/4aG7ktP121o/halo-infinite-targeting-4k-resolution-xbox-one-x

Microsoft acquires social learning platform Flipgrid

Microsoft has acquired Flipgrid, a social education app that utilizes short video clips to create collaborative lesson plans. The Minneapolis-based startup, which began life as Vidku, has had strong growth for an experience that has been alternatively described as Instagram and Snapchat for the classroom. Early last year, it reported an 800 percent year-over-year growth in teacher accounts.
It’s certainly a play that makes sense in Microsoft’s portfolio, as the company looks to take back the education market currently being dominated by Google, thanks to its wildly popular Chromebook category. In May of last year, the company launched an educational variant of Windows 10, which joined such existing plays as its Minecraft Education Edition.
“We’re thrilled to see the impact Flipgrid has had in social learning thus far and look forward to helping them continue to thrive as part of the Microsoft family,” Microsoft VP Eran Megiddo, said in a release tied to the announcement. “We’re diligently committed to making sure their platform and products continue to work across the Microsoft, Google and partner ecosystems to benefit students and teachers everywhere.” 
How, precisely, Flipgrid will fit into Microsoft’s overall edtech play remains to be seen, though the company has already integrated the app into Microsoft Teams in Office 365 for Education. As with its Office 365 Education offering, the company will be making the app free for schools. Those who already purchased an account, meanwhile, will be getting a refund.
A round of updates to the app is forthcoming, as well. Microsoft will be unveiling those at Flipgrid’s education conference in early April. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Microsoft acquires social learning platform Flipgrid

After twenty years of Salesforce, what Marc Benioff got right and wrong about the cloud

Grant Miller
Contributor

Share on Twitter

Grant Miller is the co-founder of Replicated

As we enter the 20th year of Salesforce, there’s an interesting opportunity to reflect back on the change that Marc Benioff created with the software-as-a-service (SaaS) model for enterprise software with his launch of Salesforce.com.
This model has been validated by the annual revenue stream of SaaS companies, which is fast approaching $100 billion by most estimates, and it will likely continue to transform many slower-moving industries for years to come.
However, for the cornerstone market in IT — large enterprise-software deals — SaaS represents less than 25 percent of total revenue, according to most market estimates. This split is even evident in the most recent high profile “SaaS” acquisition of GitHub by Microsoft, with over 50 percent of GitHub’s revenue coming from the sale of their on-prem offering, GitHub Enterprise.  
Data privacy and security is also becoming a major issue, with Benioff himself even pushing for a U.S. privacy law on par with GDPR in the European Union. While consumer data is often the focus of such discussions, it’s worth remembering that SaaS providers store and process an incredible amount of personal data on behalf of their customers, and the content of that data goes well beyond email addresses for sales leads.
It’s time to reconsider the SaaS model in a modern context, integrating developments of the last nearly two decades so that enterprise software can reach its full potential. More specifically, we need to consider the impact of IaaS and “cloud-native computing” on enterprise software, and how they’re blurring the lines between SaaS and on-premises applications. As the world around enterprise software shifts and the tools for building it advance, do we really need such stark distinctions about what can run where?
Source: Getty Images/KTSDESIGN/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
The original cloud software thesis
In his book, Behind the Cloud, Benioff lays out four primary reasons for the introduction of the cloud-based SaaS model:

Realigning vendor success with customer success by creating a subscription-based pricing model that grows with each customer’s usage (providing the opportunity to “land and expand”). Previously, software licenses often cost millions of dollars and were paid upfront, each year after which the customer was obligated to pay an additional 20 percent for support fees. This traditional pricing structure created significant financial barriers to adoption and made procurement painful and elongated.
Putting software in the browser to kill the client-server enterprise software delivery experience. Benioff recognized that consumers were increasingly comfortable using websites to accomplish complex tasks. By utilizing the browser, Salesforce avoided the complex local client installation and allowed its software to be accessed anywhere, anytime and on any device.
Sharing the cost of expensive compute resources across multiple customers by leveraging a multi-tenant architecture. This ensured that no individual customer needed to invest in expensive computing hardware required to run a given monolithic application. For context, in 1999 a gigabyte of RAM cost about $1,000 and a TB of disk storage was $30,000. Benioff cited a typical enterprise hardware purchase of $385,000 in order to run Siebel’s CRM product that might serve 200 end-users.
Democratizing the availability of software by removing the installation, maintenance and upgrade challenges. Drawing from his background at Oracle, he cited experiences where it took 6-18 months to complete the installation process. Additionally, upgrades were notorious for their complexity and caused significant downtime for customers. Managing enterprise applications was a very manual process, generally with each IT org becoming the ops team executing a physical run-book for each application they purchased.

These arguments also happen to be, more or less, that same ones made by infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) providers such as Amazon Web Services during their early days in the mid-late ‘00s. However, IaaS adds value at a layer deeper than SaaS, providing the raw building blocks rather than the end product. The result of their success in renting cloud computing, storage and network capacity has been many more SaaS applications than ever would have been possible if everybody had to follow the model Salesforce did several years earlier.
Suddenly able to access computing resources by the hour—and free from large upfront capital investments or having to manage complex customer installations—startups forsook software for SaaS in the name of economics, simplicity and much faster user growth.
Source: Getty Images
It’s a different IT world in 2018
Fast-forward to today, and in some ways it’s clear just how prescient Benioff was in pushing the world toward SaaS. Of the four reasons laid out above, Benioff nailed the first two:

Subscription is the right pricing model: The subscription pricing model for software has proven to be the most effective way to create customer and vendor success. Years ago already, stalwart products like Microsoft Office and the Adobe Suite  successfully made the switch from the upfront model to thriving subscription businesses. Today, subscription pricing is the norm for many flavors of software and services.
Better user experience matters: Software accessed through the browser or thin, native mobile apps (leveraging the same APIs and delivered seamlessly through app stores) have long since become ubiquitous. The consumerization of IT was a real trend, and it has driven the habits from our personal lives into our business lives.

In other areas, however, things today look very different than they did back in 1999. In particular, Benioff’s other two primary reasons for embracing SaaS no longer seem so compelling. Ironically, IaaS economies of scale (especially once Google and Microsoft began competing with AWS in earnest) and software-development practices developed inside those “web scale” companies played major roles in spurring these changes:

Computing is now cheap: The cost of compute and storage have been driven down so dramatically that there are limited cost savings in shared resources. Today, a gigabyte of RAM is about $5 and a terabyte of disk storage is about $30 if you buy them directly. Cloud providers give away resources to small users and charge only pennies per hour for standard-sized instances. By comparison, at the same time that Salesforce was founded, Google was running on its first data center—with combined total compute and RAM comparable to that of a single iPhone X. That is not a joke.
Installing software is now much easier: The process of installing and upgrading modern software has become automated with the emergence of continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) and configuration-management tools. With the rapid adoption of containers and microservices, cloud-native infrastructure has become the de facto standard for local development and is becoming the standard for far more reliable, resilient and scalable cloud deployment. Enterprise software packed as a set of Docker containers orchestrated by Kubernetes or Docker Swarm, for example, can be installed pretty much anywhere and be live in minutes.

Sourlce: Getty Images/ERHUI1979
What Benioff didn’t foresee
Several other factors have also emerged in the last few years that beg the question of whether the traditional definition of SaaS can really be the only one going forward. Here, too, there’s irony in the fact that many of the forces pushing software back toward self-hosting and management can be traced directly to the success of SaaS itself, and cloud computing in general:

Cloud computing can now be “private”: Virtual private clouds (VPCs) in the IaaS world allow enterprises to maintain root control of the OS, while outsourcing the physical management of machines to providers like Google, DigitalOcean, Microsoft, Packet or AWS. This allows enterprises (like Capital One) to relinquish hardware management and the headache it often entails, but retain control over networks, software and data. It is also far easier for enterprises to get the necessary assurance for the security posture of Amazon, Microsoft and Google than it is to get the same level of assurance for each of the tens of thousands of possible SaaS vendors in the world.
Regulations can penalize centralized services: One of the underappreciated consequences of Edward Snowden’s leaks, as well as an awakening to the sometimes questionable data-privacy practices of companies like Facebook, is an uptick in governments and enterprises trying to protect themselves and their citizens from prying eyes. Using applications hosted in another country or managed by a third party exposes enterprises to a litany of legal issues. The European Union’s GDPR law, for example, exposes SaaS companies to more potential liability with each piece of EU-citizen data they store, and puts enterprises on the hook for how their SaaS providers manage data.
Data breach exposure is higher than ever: A corollary to the point above is the increased exposure to cybercrime that companies face as they build out their SaaS footprints. All it takes is one employee at a SaaS provider clicking on the wrong link or installing the wrong Chrome extension to expose that provider’s customers’ data to criminals. If the average large enterprise uses 1,000+ SaaS applications and each of those vendors averages 250 employees, that’s an additional 250,000 possible points of entry for an attacker.
Applications are much more portable: The SaaS revolution has resulted in software vendors developing their applications to be cloud-first, but they’re now building those applications using technologies (such as containers) that can help replicate the deployment of those applications onto any infrastructure. This shift to what’s called cloud-native computing means that the same complex applications you can sign up to use in a multi-tenant cloud environment can also be deployed into a private data center or VPC much easier than previously possible. Companies like BigID, StackRox, Dashbase and others are taking a private cloud-native instance first approach to their application offerings. Meanwhile SaaS stalwarts like Atlassian, Box, Github and many others are transitioning over to Kubernetes driven, cloud-native architectures that provide this optionality in the future.  
The script got flipped on CIOs: Individuals and small teams within large companies now drive software adoption by selecting the tools (e.g., GitHub, Slack, HipChat, Dropbox), often SaaS, that best meet their needs. Once they learn what’s being used and how it’s working, CIOs are faced with the decision to either restrict network access to shadow IT or pursue an enterprise license—or the nearest thing to one—for those services. This trend has been so impactful that it spawned an entirely new category called cloud access security brokers—another vendor that needs to be paid, an additional layer of complexity, and another avenue for potential problems. Managing local versions of these applications brings control back to the CIO and CISO.

Source: Getty Images/MIKIEKWOODS
The future of software is location agnostic
As the pace of technological disruption picks up, the previous generation of SaaS companies is facing a future similar to the legacy software providers they once displaced. From mainframes up through cloud-native (and even serverless) computing, the goal for CIOs has always been to strike the right balance between cost, capabilities, control and flexibility. Cloud-native computing, which encompasses a wide variety of IT facets and often emphasizes open source software, is poised to deliver on these benefits in a manner that can adapt to new trends as they emerge.
The problem for many of today’s largest SaaS vendors is that they were founded and scaled out during the pre-cloud-native era, meaning they’re burdened by some serious technical and cultural debt. If they fail to make the necessary transition, they’ll be disrupted by a new generation of SaaS companies (and possibly traditional software vendors) that are agnostic toward where their applications are deployed and who applies the pre-built automation that simplifies management. This next generation of vendors will more control in the hands of end customers (who crave control), while maintaining what vendors have come to love about cloud-native development and cloud-based resources.
So, yes, Marc Benioff and Salesforce were absolutely right to champion the “No Software” movement over the past two decades, because the model of enterprise software they targeted needed to be destroyed. In the process, however, Salesforce helped spur a cloud computing movement that would eventually rewrite the rules on enterprise IT and, now, SaaS itself.

After twenty years of Salesforce, what Marc Benioff got right and wrong about the cloud

Fortnite and Super Smash Bros make the ultimate esports splash at E3

Fortnite’s first big tournament takes over LA.

If you’re interested in esports or just gaming, in general, it’s impossible you missed E3 this past week.

But among all the hot new titles gamers are eagerly awaiting their chance to get their hands on, there were some more competitive events taking place. Epic Games threw it’s first big Fortnite tournament, a $3 million charity Pro-Am, while Nintendo unveiled the next chapter in the popular Super Smash Bros series.

But it wasn’t all E3. Just mostly.

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wmexperts/~3/s_8ou86aBtI/week-esports-june-17

Grab a Black & Decker string trimmer and sweeper together for $61

Better together.

This Black & Decker LCC221 String Trimmer and Edger Plus Sweeper combo is down to $60.99 on Amazon. It normally sells for around $75. While we’ve seen this bundle go as low as $70 in the past, it has never gone as low as today’s sale. The string trimmer by itself is usually $59.

The bundle includes a string trimmer, which has an automatic feed spool, and a sweeper that’s perfect for clearing decks, driveways, and sidewalks. They are both lightweight and battery powered, and the combo comes with one 20V Max battery. Users give it 3.9 stars based on 271 reviews.

If you’re buying this trimmer brand new, you probably won’t need a replacement spool right away, but it never hurts to have some just in case. You can get a 3-pack on Amazon for just $19.80.

See on Amazon

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wmexperts/~3/DSYCLzmEgFM/thrifter-deal-grab-black-decker-string-trimmer-and-sweeper-together-61

Samsung's T5 500GB portable SSD is down to an all new low price of $130

Great price.

The Samsung T5 500GB portable solid state drive is down to $129.99 on Amazon for the first time. This price is an all new low for the T5 and beats the previous low by $20. This deal is even better than last year’s holiday shopping season.

The 250GB version of this SSD also dropped in price recently. It’s down to $99.99 from $120.

The Samsung T5 has gotten quite a few great critical reviews in a short amount of time, including an Editor’s Choice and 4 stars from PC Mag, 4.5 stars from Tech Radar, and a review from Forbes that said it “offers a great sweet spot in terms of size, performance and price.” Amazon users give it 4.7 stars based on 539 reviews. Samsung backs it up with a three-year warranty, as well.

See on Amazon

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wmexperts/~3/0IsQOFIixgA/thrifter-deal-grab-samsung-t5-500gb-portable-ssd-130-right-now

Chime in: Is Intel losing its relevancy in the Windows world?

Intel has always been the cornerstone of Windows PCs, is that beginning to fade?

There has been a lot of focus recently on competitors to Intel’s dominance in powering Windows 10 PCs. In one corner, you have the traditional competition from AMD, a company which has recently enjoyed a resurgence with its Ryzen and Threadripper processors.

In the other, you have Qualcomm, the driving force behind ARM-powered Windows 10 devices and the newly announced Snapdragon 850.

And all this has prompted a bit of a discussion down in the Windows Central forums.

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wmexperts/~3/hYC_9B0medg/chime-intel-losing-its-relevancy-windows-world

Jam this summer with Ultimate Ears' $50 Wonderboom Bluetooth Speaker

Splash around with no regrets.

The grey waterproof Wonderboom Bluetooth speaker by Ultimate Ears is on sale at Dell for just $49.99 right now. It regularly sells for up to $100 in stores, though Amazon has select colors on sale for as low as $63 currently. Shipping for this item is free at Dell.

The Wonderboom has an IPX7 waterproof rating allowing you to submerge it up to 1 meter for 30 minutes. It’s a great fit for the shower, the beach, a picnic, and so much more, as you won’t have to worry about the weather or water damaging it.

It can play music for up to ten hours on a single charge and can be connected to other UE Wonderboom speakers to boost the sound. It sends out audio in 360 degrees so you can hear it well from any direction. There’s an integrated hanging loop letting you easily attach it to a bag or backpack while traveling.

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wmexperts/~3/mowKQccgCNM/thrifter-deal-ultimate-ears-wonderboom-bluetooth-speaker